Utilisateur:Laura Conant

Scan to OCR

Traitement d'un PDF avec Tesseract

Scans et sortie du texte

→ Sens de lecture opéré par Tesseract sur le document pdf.

Hackers

ducers

as

 

Pro

Artists and hackers both represent contemporary
types of unconventional authorship. In their own
respective ways, they both appear as autonomous
producers and not as contractors. Their autonomy
is based on an aspiration towards individual freedom,
but they each justify this in completely different ways.
In an emphatic sense, freedom is the foundation of
an artist’s work. This freedom legitimates or even
demands a demiurgic act of positioning from which
the work then unfolds — and it justifies the close
relationship between “author” and “work”. In contrast,
a hacker begins by experiencing an absolute dearth
of freedom. His work unfolds while dealing with an

Felix Stalder

183

Texte entier tout pdf combinés :
omnipotent system! in which all options for action
are predetermined. The hacker’s goal is to seize hold
of moments of freedom anyway.

“Artists” and “hackers” are ideal types here,
conceptual abstractions. They were formed to make
certain contexts more tangible. In the following, the
focus will be directed towards the relationship be-
tween respective notions of freedom and social mecha-
nisms functioning within regimes of order.

The assumption that artists begin from a posi-
tion of complete freedom is a historical development
as a part of liberal concepts of freedom: Every man is
born in liberty, which is finally expressed by the stew-
ardship rights he has for his own body.’ This freedom
legitimates private property, understood as the fruits
of the labor performed by one’s own body. This con-
cept is directed against old forms of serfdom, bonded
labor and arbitrary disenfranchisement or taxation.
It re-oriented society away from the distribution of
goods based on privilege bestowed by a sovereign and
towards the production of goods by entrepreneurs;
their objectives were thus moved to the center of
society’s agenda. This concept of freedom as the point
of foundation for social interaction was essential for
the liberal understanding of the interrelated catego-
ries “individual” and “private property”.

1 Systems are integrated contexts of function. What functioning is
can be determined technically, culturally or institutionally.

2 John Locke’s (1632-1704) formulation of individual freedom as
determined by the stewardship over one’s own body is conceived of
from a clearly male perspective. Self-determination of a female body
is still, even in liberal societies, a question of debate.

184

In this cosmos, the artist represents the most radically
expressed form of an individual’s civil liberty. This
entity is then doubly privileged by the legal order:
on the one hand, by the legal establishment of the
freedom of art, which guarantees the artist’s freedom
to work;? on the other hand, by copyright law. This
allows him to enforce the claim of understanding his
work to be the product of his labor alone, and there-
fore his exclusive property. Historically, this allowed
the artist to exit from a dependency on commission-
ing entities and to engage an audience from an equal
position. It was an emancipatory act, no doubt. So

_ far, so good.

The clarity of these findings, as the political
scientist Christian Schmidt notes, “is disturbed by
the regime of property’s propensity to expand its area
of applicability”.* The property concept’s prerequi-
sites become problematic to the degree that forms of
ideas and free will become subject to capitalist pro-
duction, such as when youth culture is transformed
into products. The consequences of this expansion
are that “the clear separation between people and
property, or put differently, people’s autonomy is
questioned”.°

If a person constitutes himself or herself as the
sole active author, then others are forced into the role
of being a passive audience. As long as this is only done

3 Art. 21 of the Federal Constitution of the Swiss Confederation
determines: “The freedom of art is guaranteed.”

4 Schmidt, Christian: Individualitat und Eigentum. Zur Rekonstruktion
zweier Grundbegriffe der Moderne. Frankfurt am Main 2006, p. 13.

5 Ibid., p. 107.

185
�Media Hack
Lock Picking

Cb. ----— — 5

Hacker brechen Systeme auf und andern Regeln.

niert auch Kiinstlerinnen und Kiinstler, wie
Arbeiten von etoy, UBERMORGEN und der IMediengruppe
Bitnik zeigen. Texte von Raffael Dérig, Hannes Gassert,
Verena Kuni, Claus Pias und Felix Stalder.

Das faszi

stems and change rules. Artists are
as the work ofetoy, UBERMORGEN
tnik shows. Contributions by
ert, Verena Kuni, Claus Pias

Hackers break into sy
also fascinated by this,
and the !Mediengruppe Bi
Raffael Dérig, Hannes Gass
and Felix Stalder.

 

www.edition- digitalculture.ch

eww Ee LEIS

Script Kiddie
etc.

www.edition-digitalculture.ch | l | | il

Poster 1

→ Mise en évidence du sens de lecture de Tesseract

Poster 2

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
 <meta charset="utf-8">
<head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" href="style2.css">
</head>
<body>
        <section data-type="page">
        <section id="line">
        <svg height="210" width="500">
                <line x1="" y1="0" x2="240" y2="0" style="stroke:rgb(255, 0, 0);stroke-width:8" />
              </svg>
        </section>
        <section id="line">
        <svg height="210" width="500">
                <line x1="150" y1="120" x2="240" y2="0" style="stroke:rgb(255,0,0);stroke-width:4" />
              </svg>
        </section>
        <section id="line">
                <svg height="210" width="500">
                        <line x1="150" y1="120" x2="149" y2="195" style="stroke:rgb(255,0,0);stroke-width:4" />
                      </svg>
                </section>
        <section id="line">
                <svg height="210" width="500">
                        <line x1="150" y1="195" x2="-30000" y2="200" style="stroke:rgb(255,0,0);stroke-width:4" />
                      </svg>
                </section>
                <section id="line">
                        <svg height="210" width="500">
                                <line x1="243" y1="120" x2="240" y2="188" style="stroke:rgb(255,0,0);stroke-width:4" />
                              </svg>
                        </section>
                        <section id="line3">
                                <svg height="500" width="700">
                                        <line x1="60" y1="230" x2="370" y2="373" style="stroke:rgb(255,0,0);stroke-width:4" />
                                      </svg>
                                </section>
                <section id="line2">
                        <svg height="300" width="600">
                                <line x1="1" y1="13" x2="241" y2="6" style="stroke:rgb(255,0,0);stroke-width:4" />
                              </svg>
                        </section>
                        <section id="line3">
                                <svg height="500" width="700">
                                        <line x1="60" y1="230" x2="30" y2="483" style="stroke:rgb(255,0,0);stroke-width:4" />
                                      </svg>
                                </section>

                                        <section id="line4">
                                                <svg height="500" width="700">
                                                        <line x1="4" y1="8" x2="1" y2="105" style="stroke:rgb(255,0,0);stroke-width:4" />
                                                      </svg>
                                                </section>
                <section id="line5">
                         <svg height="500" width="700">
                         <line x1="27" y1="8" x2="1" y2="65" style="stroke:rgb(255,0,0);stroke-width:4" />
                         </svg>
                 </section>
                 <section id="line5">
                        <svg height="500" width="700">
                        <line x1="280" y1="220" x2="1" y2="65" style="stroke:rgb(255,0,0);stroke-width:4" />
                        </svg>
                </section>
                <section id="line5">
                        <svg height="500" width="700">
                        <line x1="280" y1="220" x2="1" y2="238" style="stroke:rgb(255,0,0);stroke-width:4" />
                        </svg>
                </section>
                <section id="line5">
                        <svg height="600" width="700">
                        <line x1="1" y1="550" x2="1" y2="238" style="stroke:rgb(255,0,0);stroke-width:6" />
                        </svg>
                </section>
                <section id="line5">
                        <svg height="700" width="700">
                        <line x1="1" y1="550" x2="248" y2="660" style="stroke:rgb(255,0,0);stroke-width:4" />
                        </svg>
                </section>
                <section id="line5">
                        <svg height="700" width="700">
                        <line x1="1" y1="670" x2="248" y2="660" style="stroke:rgb(255,0,0);stroke-width:4" />
                        </svg>
                </section>
                <section id="line5">
                        <svg height="800" width="700">
                        <line x1="1" y1="670" x2="1" y2="700" style="stroke:rgb(255,0,0);stroke-width:6" />
                        </svg>
                </section>
                <section id="line6">
                        <svg height="700" width="700">
                        <line x1="1" y1="280" x2="1" y2="150" style="stroke:rgb(255,0,0);stroke-width:6" />
                        </svg>
                </section>
                <section id="line6">
                        <svg height="700" width="700">
                        <line x1="10" y1="290" x2="1" y2="280" style="stroke:rgb(255,0,0);stroke-width:4" />
                        </svg>
                </section>
                <section id="line6">
                        <svg height="700" width="700">
                        <line x1="10" y1="290" x2="280" y2="295" style="stroke:rgb(255,0,0);stroke-width:4" />
                        </svg>
                </section>
                <section id="line6">
                        <svg height="700" width="700">
                        <line x1="1" y1="340" x2="280" y2="295" style="stroke:rgb(255,0,0);stroke-width:4" />
                        </svg>
                </section>
                <section id="line6">
                        <svg height="700" width="700">
                        <line x1="1" y1="340" x2="255" y2="385" style="stroke:rgb(255,0,0);stroke-width:4" />
                        </svg>
                </section>


                <h1 class="h1" id="Media">
                        Media Hack<br>
                        Cb. ----— — 5<br>
                        Lock Picking
                    </h1>
                    
                    <p class="p" id="order1">
                    Hacker brechen Systeme auf und andern Regeln.<br>
                    niert auch Kiinstlerinnen und Kiinstler, wie<br>
                    Arbeiten von etoy, UBERMORGEN und der IMediengruppe<br>
                    Bitnik zeigen. Texte von Raffael Dérig, Hannes Gassert,<br>
                    Verena Kuni, Claus Pias und Felix Stalder.<br>
                    </p>
                    
                    <p class="p" id="order2">
                    Das faszi
                    </p>
                    
                    <p class="p" id="order3">
                    stems and change rules. Artists are<br>
                    as the work ofetoy, UBERMORGEN<br>
                    tnik shows. Contributions by<br>
                    ert, Verena Kuni, Claus Pias<br>
                    </p>
                    
                    <p class="p" id="order4">
                    Hackers break into sy<br>
                    also fascinated by this,<br>
                    and the !Mediengruppe Bi<br>
                    Raffael Dérig, Hannes Gass<br>
                    and Felix Stalder.<br>
                    </p>
                    
                     
                    <p class="p" id="order5">
                    www.edition- digitalculture.ch<br>
                    
                    eww Ee LEIS<br>
                    
                    Script Kiddie<br>
                    etc.<br>
                    
                    www.edition-digitalculture.ch | l | | il<br>
                    </p>
                    
                    <h1 class="h1"id="hackers">
                    Hackers
                    </h1>
                    
                    <h1 class="h1" id="ducers">
                            ducers
                            </h1>
                    
                    
                            <h1 class="h1" id="as">
                                    
                                    as
                                    </h1>
                                    <h1 class="h1" id="pro">
                                            Pro
                                            </h1>               
                    <p class="p" id="order6">
                    Artists and hackers both represent contemporary
                    types of unconventional authorship. In their own
                    respective ways, they both appear as autonomous
                    producers and not as contractors. Their autonomy
                    is based on an aspiration towards individual freedom,
                    but they each justify this in completely different ways.
                    In an emphatic sense, freedom is the foundation of
                    an artist’s work. This freedom legitimates or even
                    demands a demiurgic act of positioning from which
                    the work then unfolds — and it justifies the close
                    relationship between “author” and “work”. In contrast,
                    a hacker begins by experiencing an absolute dearth
                    of freedom. His work unfolds while dealing with an
                    </p>
                    
                    <h3 class="h3" id="felix">
                    Felix Stalder
                    </h3>
                    
                    
                    <p class="p" id="order7">
                    omnipotent system<span data-ref="1">!</span> in which all options for action
                    are predetermined. The hacker’s goal is to seize hold
                    of moments of freedom anyway.
                    </p>
                    
                    <p class="p" id="order8">
                    “Artists” and “hackers” are ideal types here,
                    conceptual abstractions. They were formed to make
                    certain contexts more tangible. In the following, the
                    focus will be directed towards the relationship be-
                    tween respective notions of freedom and social mecha-
                    nisms functioning within regimes of order.
                    </p>
                    
                    <p class="p" id="order9">
                    The assumption that artists begin from a posi-
                    tion of complete freedom is a historical development
                    as a part of liberal concepts of freedom: Every man is
                    born in liberty, which is finally expressed by the stew-
                    ardship rights he has for his own body.<span data-ref="2">’</span> This freedom
                    legitimates private property, understood as the fruits
                    of the labor performed by one’s own body. This con-
                    cept is directed against old forms of serfdom, bonded
                    labor and arbitrary disenfranchisement or taxation.
                    It re-oriented society away from the distribution of
                    goods based on privilege bestowed by a sovereign and
                    towards the production of goods by entrepreneurs;
                    their objectives were thus moved to the center of
                    society’s agenda. This concept of freedom as the point
                    of foundation for social interaction was essential for
                    the liberal understanding of the interrelated catego-
                    ries “individual” and “private property”.
                    </p>
                    
                    <footer class="footer" id="footer1">
                    1 Systems are integrated contexts of function. What functioning is
                    can be determined technically, culturally or institutionally.
                    </footer>
                    
                    <footer class="footer" id="footer2">
                    <span data-ref="2">2</span>     John Locke’s (1632-1704) formulation of individual freedom as
                    determined by the stewardship over one’s own body is conceived of
                    from a clearly male perspective. Self-determination of a female body
                    is still, even in liberal societies, a question of debate.
                    </footer>
                    
                    <p class="p" id="order10">
                    184
                    </p>
                    
                    <p class="p" id="order11">
                    In this cosmos, the artist represents the most radically
                    expressed form of an individual’s civil liberty. This
                    entity is then doubly privileged by the legal order:
                    on the one hand, by the legal establishment of the
                    freedom of art, which guarantees the artist’s freedom
                    to work;<span data-ref="3">?</span> on the other hand, by copyright law. This
                    allows him to enforce the claim of understanding his
                    work to be the product of his labor alone, and there-
                    fore his exclusive property. Historically, this allowed
                    the artist to exit from a dependency on commission-
                    ing entities and to engage an audience from an equal
                    position. It was an emancipatory act, no doubt. So
                    </p>
                    
                    <p class="p" id="order12">
                    _ far, so good.
                    </p>
                    
                    <p class="p" id="order13">
                    The clarity of these findings, as the political
                    scientist Christian Schmidt notes, “is disturbed by
                    the regime of property’s propensity to expand its area
                    of applicability”.<span data-ref="4">*</span> The property concept’s prerequi-
                    sites become problematic to the degree that forms of
                    ideas and free will become subject to capitalist pro-
                    duction, such as when youth culture is transformed
                    into products. The consequences of this expansion
                    are that “the clear separation between people and
                    property, or put differently, people’s autonomy is
                    questioned”.<span data-ref="5">°</span>
                    </p>
                    
                    <p class="p" id="order14">
                    If a person constitutes himself or herself as the
                    sole active author, then others are forced into the role
                    of being a passive audience. As long as this is only done
                    </p>
                    
                    <p class="p" id="order15">
                    185
                    </p>

</section>

</body>�
</html>

Lecture par la machine